SoulTraceSoulTrace

16 Personalities Test: How It Works, What It Gets Right, and Where It Falls Short

Table of Contents

By

- 12 min Read

16 Personalities Test: How It Works, What It Gets Right, and Where It Falls Short

The 16 Personalities test at 16personalities.com is the most popular personality assessment online. Hundreds of millions of people have taken it. Results get shared on social media constantly. When someone says "I took the MBTI," they almost always mean they took the 16 Personalities test.

But the 16 Personalities test isn't MBTI. It's built on a different framework, adds a dimension that Myers-Briggs never included, and measures personality differently than the official instrument. Understanding what you're actually taking matters for interpreting your results.

What the 16 Personalities Test Actually Is

The 16 Personalities test is built on what the platform calls the NERIS framework. Despite producing the same 16 type codes as MBTI (INTJ, ENFP, etc.), it's a distinct assessment with its own theoretical basis.

The test measures five dimensions, not four:

Mind: Introversion (I) vs. Extraversion (E) — How you interact with your environment. Introverts prefer fewer, deeper interactions. Extraverts prefer broader, more frequent engagement.

Energy: Intuition (N) vs. Observant/Sensing (S) — How you process information. Intuitive types focus on abstract possibilities. Observant types focus on concrete realities.

Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F) — How you make decisions and handle emotions. Thinking types prioritize logic and objectivity. Feeling types prioritize values and social considerations.

Tactics: Judging (J) vs. Prospecting/Perceiving (P) — How you approach work and planning. Judging types prefer structure and decisiveness. Prospecting types prefer flexibility and improvisation.

Identity: Assertive (-A) vs. Turbulent (-T) — How confident and emotionally stable you are. Assertive types handle stress evenly and feel self-assured. Turbulent types are more emotionally reactive and self-conscious.

That fifth dimension—Identity—is the key difference. MBTI has four dimensions and 16 types. The 16 Personalities test has five dimensions and effectively 32 subtypes (each of the 16 types split into Assertive and Turbulent variants).

The Identity dimension is essentially neuroticism from the Big Five personality model, which measures emotional stability as a core personality trait. By adding it, 16Personalities creates a hybrid that borrows MBTI's type structure while incorporating Big Five science.

How the Test Works

You respond to about 60 statements on a seven-point agree-disagree scale. Statements like "You regularly make new friends" or "You find it difficult to introduce yourself to other people" measure where you fall on each dimension.

The test is fully self-report—your score depends entirely on how you perceive yourself. There's no behavioral observation, no adaptive questioning, no external validation. You rate statements, the algorithm tallies your responses, and you get placed on one side of each dimension.

The scoring is straightforward: your aggregate responses on each dimension determine your letter. If you lean even slightly toward Introversion, you get I. Slightly toward Extraversion, you get E. The degree doesn't change your type—it only changes the percentage shown in your results.

The test takes about 12 minutes. Results are immediate. No email required, no paywall, no account needed.

The Type Profiles

16Personalities organizes its 16 types into four temperament groups, each with its own nomenclature:

Analysts: Architect (INTJ), Logician (INTP), Commander (ENTJ), Debater (ENTP)

Diplomats: Advocate (INFJ), Mediator (INFP), Protagonist (ENFJ), Campaigner (ENFP)

Sentinels: Logistician (ISTJ), Defender (ISFJ), Executive (ESTJ), Consul (ESFJ)

Explorers: Virtuoso (ISTP), Adventurer (ISFP), Entrepreneur (ESTP), Entertainer (ESFP)

Each type profile covers personality overview, strengths and weaknesses, romantic relationships, friendships, parenthood, career paths, and workplace habits. The profiles are extensive—thousands of words each, well-written, and designed to feel personally relevant.

This is 16Personalities' greatest strength. The type descriptions are polished, nuanced, and engaging. Reading your profile genuinely prompts self-reflection, regardless of whether the underlying measurement is precise.

For the full theory behind MBTI's 16 types, the framework goes deeper than any single test.

What the 16 Personalities Test Gets Right

Accessibility

No personality assessment comes close to 16Personalities for ease of use. Clean design, clear questions, immediate results, available in 30+ languages, completely free. The barrier to entry is essentially zero.

Production Quality

The type profiles are beautifully written. Illustrations, color coding, and clear organization make results genuinely enjoyable to explore. Most personality tests present results as data tables. 16Personalities presents them as narratives.

Community Effect

Because so many people have taken it, 16Personalities results serve as social currency. Saying "I'm an INFP" communicates something to millions of people who share the framework. This network effect is valuable regardless of the test's scientific precision.

Starting Point for Self-Knowledge

The type descriptions prompt genuine introspection. Even if the measurement is imperfect, reading about how your type approaches relationships, conflict, career, and personal growth generates useful self-awareness. The value is in the reflection, not the label.

The Identity Dimension

Adding Assertive/Turbulent is actually smart. MBTI's biggest blind spot is ignoring emotional stability entirely. Two people with the same four-letter type but different stress responses and confidence levels live very different lives. The Identity dimension captures something MBTI misses.

Where the 16 Personalities Test Falls Short

Dichotomy-Based Measurement

The 16 Personalities test measures four dimensions directly and sorts you to one side or the other. This is the simplest approach to personality typing—and the least nuanced.

The core problem: most people score near the center of most dimensions. If you're 52% Thinking and 48% Feeling, you get assigned T. But your experience of decision-making is essentially balanced. The binary label misrepresents your actual position.

More sophisticated approaches exist. Function-based tests like Sakinorva measure eight cognitive functions independently, giving you a richer picture of how you actually think. The 16 Personalities test trades that nuance for simplicity.

Test-Retest Reliability

Like all MBTI-style tests, the 16 Personalities test suffers from inconsistent results. Take it on Monday after a good weekend and you might get ENFP. Take it on Friday after a stressful week and you might get INFJ. Studies suggest 40-50% of people get a different type on retest.

For borderline scores, the test is essentially flipping a coin on one or more dimensions. This is a fundamental limitation of categorical personality typing, not a flaw specific to 16Personalities. But they don't emphasize this limitation in their results.

For more on why personality test accuracy matters, the reliability question affects what conclusions you can draw.

The Barnum Effect

16Personalities' type descriptions are well-written and detailed. They're also written to feel accurate to anyone who receives them. Research on personality feedback shows that people rate generic, flattering descriptions as highly accurate when told the descriptions were generated specifically for them.

Test this yourself: read the profile for a type two letters different from your result. If it also feels surprisingly accurate, the Barnum effect is at work. The descriptions capture broad human experiences, not type-specific realities.

Not Actually MBTI

16Personalities explicitly states it's based on the NERIS framework, not MBTI. But the type codes, type names, and community discussions treat results as MBTI types. This creates confusion: people think they know their MBTI type when they've taken a test built on different theoretical foundations.

The distinction matters because MBTI theory involves cognitive function stacks—a theoretical layer that 16Personalities ignores entirely. An INTJ in MBTI theory is defined by dominant Introverted Intuition and auxiliary Extraverted Thinking. An INTJ on 16Personalities is defined by scoring on the I, N, T, and J side of four independent scales. These aren't the same construct.

Assertive/Turbulent as a Type Dimension

While measuring emotional stability is valuable, framing it as a binary type dimension has the same problem as the other four: it forces a continuous trait into a category. You're either Assertive or Turbulent, with no middle ground acknowledged.

Additionally, neuroticism (which Assertive/Turbulent essentially measures) is a trait, not a type preference. It's more accurately described as a spectrum you sit on, not a category you belong to. The Big Five model handles this correctly by treating it as a continuous dimension.

16 Personalities vs. Other Free Tests

vs. Sakinorva

Sakinorva measures cognitive functions, giving you scores on all eight functions and multiple type calculations. It's more informative but less polished. If 16Personalities gives you one answer in a beautiful package, Sakinorva gives you three answers and makes you figure out what they mean.

Use 16Personalities for a first test. Use Sakinorva when you want to understand the function theory underlying your type. For a detailed comparison, our Sakinorva test guide covers what each algorithm measures.

vs. Official MBTI

The official MBTI costs $49.95 and uses a forced-choice question format rather than Likert scales. It doesn't include the Identity dimension. It comes with professional interpretation resources. In terms of raw accuracy, neither is clearly superior—both use dichotomy-based measurement with similar reliability issues.

vs. Truity TypeFinder

Truity uses a hybrid approach and produces a clean, readable result. But the full report is paid. 16Personalities gives you more for free than Truity does.

For the full landscape of alternatives to the 16 Personalities test, several free and paid options exist.

What to Do With Your Results

Your 16 Personalities result is a starting hypothesis, not a diagnosis. Here's how to use it productively:

Explore the profile but cross-reference. Read your type profile carefully. Then take a second test using a different methodology—Sakinorva or Michael Caloz. If the results agree, your type is probably in the right ballpark. If they disagree, read both profiles and see which resonates more with your actual experience.

Focus on strong preferences. If you scored 90% Introversion, that tells you something real. If you scored 55% Thinking, that tells you very little—you're essentially balanced on that dimension.

Use the framework for communication. 16Personalities' type language is useful for discussing differences with partners, friends, and colleagues. "I process decisions through values" is a more productive conversation starter than a personality debate.

Don't use it for major decisions. Career pivots, hiring decisions, relationship compatibility assessments—these are too consequential for a test with moderate reliability and limited predictive validity. Use results as one input among many.

Read the criticism. Understanding MBTI's scientific problems and accuracy limitations helps you calibrate how seriously to take any MBTI-style result, including 16Personalities.

A Different Approach to Personality

The 16 Personalities test is the easiest way to get a personality type label. For social sharing and initial self-exploration, it works well.

But personality isn't 16 boxes. And the act of measurement shouldn't be a fixed questionnaire that asks everyone the same questions regardless of their answers.

The SoulTrace assessment works differently:

  • Adaptive questioning: Bayesian active learning selects each question based on your previous answers, converging on your personality pattern rather than cycling through a fixed list
  • Five psychological drives: Structure, Understanding, Agency, Intensity, Connection—measured as continuous dimensions, not binary categories
  • 25 archetypes with probability distributions: Results show how strongly you match each archetype, not a single forced assignment
  • Twenty-four questions: Shorter than the 16 Personalities test, with more information extracted per question

No dichotomies to split you on. No Barnum-effect descriptions that feel accurate because they're vague. No type that changes depending on the day you take it.

Free, fast, and built on measurement methodology designed for personality assessment rather than adapted from a 1940s questionnaire.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 16 Personalities test the same as the MBTI?

No. The 16 Personalities test uses the NERIS framework, which measures five dimensions (including Assertive/Turbulent) rather than MBTI's four. It produces the same 16 type codes but measures personality differently and doesn't use MBTI's cognitive function theory.

Is the 16 Personalities test free?

Yes, completely free. No account required, no paywall, no premium tier. All type profiles and results are accessible without payment.

How accurate is the 16 Personalities test?

Moderate. Like all MBTI-style tests, it has test-retest reliability issues (many people get different types on retakes) and forces continuous traits into binary categories. It captures real personality variation but with less precision than scientifically validated frameworks.

Why did I get a different result than last time?

If you scored close to the center on any dimension, small changes in mood, context, or question interpretation can flip your result. This is normal and indicates you're genuinely balanced on that dimension rather than clearly one side or the other.

What does Assertive vs. Turbulent mean?

Assertive (-A) types handle stress evenly, feel confident in their abilities, and don't dwell on past mistakes. Turbulent (-T) types are more emotionally reactive, self-conscious, and driven by perfectionism. It's essentially emotional stability or neuroticism from the Big Five model.

Can I use my 16 Personalities type for career decisions?

As a conversation starter, yes. As the basis for major career decisions, no. Type-career correlations are real but weak—not strong enough to predict who will thrive in a specific role. Use your result as one data point alongside experience, skills, interests, and values.

Which type is the best on the 16 Personalities test?

None. The framework explicitly positions all types as equally valid. Each type has distinct strengths and blind spots. The test is designed for understanding, not ranking.

Soultrace

Who are you?

Stay in the loop

Get notified about new archetypes, features, and insights.