SoulTraceSoulTrace

Personality Test Results Explained: A Real Guide

Table of Contents

By

- 11 min Read

Personality Test Results Explained: A Real Guide

You got your results back. Maybe it's a four-letter code like ENFP. Maybe it's a pie chart with five colored slices. Maybe it's a number on a scale of 1 to 100 next to words you half-recognize, like "Neuroticism" and "Agreeableness."

Now what?

Here's what usually happens: you read the flattering paragraph underneath, nod along because it sounds vaguely like you, screenshot it for Instagram, and forget about it by Thursday. The result felt true, so you accepted it. But you never actually learned how to read it.

That's the gap most people fall into. Not because they're lazy, but because personality tests almost never teach you how to interpret what they're showing you. They hand you a label and a description and call it a day. The description feels accurate because it's designed to feel accurate — that's literally the job of the copy. Whether the underlying measurement is sound? Different question entirely.

This guide is about that different question. How to actually read personality test results, regardless of which framework spit them out.

Not All Results Look the Same

The first thing that trips people up: personality tests don't agree on how to present results. Different frameworks use completely different formats, and each format comes with its own set of assumptions about what personality even is.

Categorical results give you a type. The MBTI is the obvious example — you're INTJ or you're not. The Enneagram does this too: you're a Type 5 or a Type 8. These results feel clean and satisfying. They're also the most misleading, because they force a spectrum into a bucket. If you scored 51% toward Thinking and 49% toward Feeling, congratulations — you're officially a "Thinker," and the test will describe you as if that 2% gap defines your entire cognitive style.

Trait scores on a scale are what the Big Five and OCEAN tests use. Instead of a type, you get five numbers — typically percentiles or raw scores — telling you where you land on each dimension. You might be 73rd percentile in Openness, 45th in Conscientiousness, and so on. This is more honest. It's also harder to turn into a meme.

Distribution-based results show how your personality weight spreads across multiple dimensions simultaneously. Rather than five independent scores or one single type, you see a probability distribution — maybe 30% of your profile maps to one dimension, 25% to another, with the rest trailing off. SoulTrace works this way: it uses a 5-color model (White for structure, Blue for understanding, Black for agency, Red for intensity, Green for connection) and shows you a full distribution across all five, matched to one of 25 archetypes. No binary sorting. You see the whole picture, including the parts that are almost you but not quite dominant.

The format matters because it shapes how you think about yourself after reading the result. Types encourage identity ("I am an INFJ"). Scales encourage comparison ("I'm more open than most people"). Distributions encourage nuance ("My profile leans here, but I've got meaningful weight everywhere").

What "High" and "Low" Scores Actually Mean

Most people see a high score and think "good." Low score? "Bad." This is wrong, and it causes more misinterpretation than almost anything else.

Take Neuroticism on the Big Five. Scoring high means you experience negative emotions more frequently and more intensely. That sounds terrible on paper. But high Neuroticism also correlates with heightened threat detection, emotional depth, and creative output. Low Neuroticism means emotional stability — which sounds great until you realize it can also mean you're slower to recognize problems and less empathetic to others' distress.

Every trait is a tradeoff. High Agreeableness makes you a better collaborator but a worse negotiator. Low Conscientiousness makes you disorganized but more adaptable and spontaneous. There's no winning configuration. If a test presents your results as a report card with "good" and "bad" scores, that's a red flag about the test, not about you.

Percentiles confuse people too. Scoring in the 85th percentile for Extraversion doesn't mean you're 85% extraverted. It means you scored higher than 85% of the people in the comparison group. That comparison group matters a lot. If the norming sample is all American college students, your percentile means something very different than if it's a global adult population. Most free online tests don't tell you who they're comparing you to. Keep that in mind.

The Misinterpretation Hall of Fame

Some mistakes show up so often they deserve their own section.

Treating your type as fixed identity. You took the MBTI in college and got INTP. Now it's ten years later, you've started a company, you manage people, and you still introduce yourself as "an INTP" at dinner parties. Personality is relatively stable, sure, but it shifts over time — particularly Conscientiousness (which tends to increase with age) and Neuroticism (which tends to decrease). Retesting after major life changes isn't a sign of confusion. It's common sense.

Confusing preference with ability. An introversion score tells you where you get energy and what you find draining. It says absolutely nothing about your social skills. Some of the most skilled public speakers score heavily introverted. Personality tests measure tendencies and preferences, not competence. If your results say you're low in Openness, that doesn't mean you can't be creative. It means novelty-seeking isn't your default mode.

Cherry-picking the flattering parts. Every type description includes strengths and weaknesses. People read the strengths, internalize them, and skip the rest. The Barnum effect — the tendency to accept vague, positive statements as uniquely accurate — is alive and well in personality testing. If you find yourself nodding along to every sentence in your results description, slow down. That's not insight. That's good copywriting.

Comparing types across different frameworks. "I'm an INFJ and a Type 4 and high in Openness — they all say the same thing!" No, they don't. These frameworks measure different constructs using different methods. The overlap might be real, or it might be confirmation bias. The Enneagram is about core motivations and fears. The Big Five is about behavioral tendencies. MBTI is about cognitive preferences. Stacking labels from different systems doesn't make your self-knowledge three times deeper. It might just make it three times more confused.

How to Compare Results Across Frameworks

That said, there are legitimate ways to look at results from different tests side by side. You just need to know what you're comparing.

The Big Five and MBTI have well-documented correlations. Extraversion maps pretty directly. MBTI's Sensing/Intuition dimension correlates with Openness. Thinking/Feeling overlaps with Agreeableness. Judging/Perceiving maps loosely to Conscientiousness. MBTI Neuroticism doesn't exist — the system simply ignores emotional stability, which is a pretty significant blind spot.

The Enneagram doesn't map cleanly onto either, because it's measuring something fundamentally different: core fears and desires rather than behavioral patterns. A Type 5 and a Big Five introvert with high Openness might look similar on the surface, but the Type 5's driver is fear of incompetence, while the Big Five scores just describe behavioral tendencies with no claim about why.

Color-based models like DISC, True Colors, and SoulTrace's 5-color system each define their colors differently. DISC's "D" (Dominance) and SoulTrace's Black (agency/achievement) overlap in some areas but diverge in others. Don't assume that "Red" means the same thing across models. It almost certainly doesn't.

The useful approach: look at where frameworks agree and treat those as higher-confidence signals. If three different tests all suggest you're low in social energy-seeking, that pattern is probably real. Where they disagree, don't force coherence. The disagreement might be telling you that the dimension in question is genuinely ambiguous for you, or that the tests are measuring different things with similar-sounding names.

How to Spot a Bogus Test

Not every quiz with a "Share Your Results!" button is a real personality assessment. Here's what separates the signal from the noise.

Question count matters. A ten-question quiz cannot reliably measure personality. It's entertainment. Scientifically grounded tests typically need at least 20-30 questions per dimension being measured. The Big Five's standard instruments use 44 to 300 items. If the test took you two minutes, treat the results accordingly.

Watch for forced-choice questions between unrelated things. "Would you rather go to a party or read a book?" assumes these are opposites. They're not. You might love both. Good tests use Likert scales (strongly disagree to strongly agree) or adaptive question selection that adjusts based on your previous answers.

If the results are entirely positive, be suspicious. Real personality assessment includes tradeoffs. If your result reads like a horoscope — "You are creative, deeply caring, and naturally drawn to leadership" — with no mention of potential downsides or blind spots, you're reading marketing, not measurement.

Check if the test tells you about its methodology. Does it mention reliability data? Norming samples? Validation studies? The absence of this information isn't proof it's bad, but its presence is a strong signal it's serious. The Big Five has thousands of peer-reviewed papers behind it. The MBTI has formal reliability data (which is, honestly, mediocre). Random Facebook quizzes have nothing.

Also look at what happens with your data. If the test requires an email before showing results, or if "unlocking your full profile" costs money but the free version gives you just enough to get hooked — that's a monetization funnel, not a psychological instrument. Some tests will give you real, complete results without holding them hostage. SoulTrace, for instance, gives you your full results — distribution, archetype, color breakdown — in about eight minutes, no email required.

Reading Your Results Like They Mean Something

Once you've established that the test is reasonably legitimate, here's how to actually extract value from your results instead of just collecting labels.

Focus on the dimensions where you score at the extremes. A 95th percentile score in Neuroticism is actionable information. A 55th percentile score in Extraversion isn't — you're basically average, and average doesn't predict much. The midrange scores are where personality tests have the least to say about you specifically.

Read the weaknesses section first. It's the part of your results where you're most likely to learn something new. The strengths usually confirm what you already know. The weaknesses — if the test is honest enough to include them — point to patterns you might be unconsciously avoiding.

Compare your results to your actual life, not to how you wish you were. If your Big Five Conscientiousness score is low but you consider yourself organized, ask yourself: organized by whose standards? Compared to whom? Tests that measure what your personality type actually means in daily life are more useful than those that just hand you an abstract label.

Look at the secondary dimensions, not just the primary result. In MBTI, your dominant function matters, but so does your inferior function — it's where you break down under stress. In the Enneagram, your wing and your integration/disintegration lines add critical context. In distribution-based models, the second strongest color or trait often explains more about your internal tensions than the first.

And finally: test results are a starting point for reflection, not a conclusion. The best use of any personality result is as a hypothesis you test against your own experience. "This says I'm high in Openness — does that match how I actually behave? When does it fit, and when doesn't it?" That kind of thinking is worth more than any score.

The Honest Takeaway

Personality test results are tools, and like any tool, they're useful when you know how to handle them and dangerous when you don't. A hammer is great for nails. Terrible for screws. Same idea here.

Learn to read the format your test uses. Understand what the dimensions measure and what they don't. Be skeptical of anything that feels too flattering. Compare across frameworks carefully, not by stacking labels. And treat your results as the start of a conversation with yourself — not the final word.

The test that matters most isn't the one with the fanciest results page. It's the one that makes you think about something you hadn't considered before.

Soultrace

Who are you?

Stay in the loop

Get notified about new archetypes, features, and insights.