Four Temperaments Test: Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholic, Phlegmatic

By

- 9 min Read

Four Temperaments Test: Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholic, Phlegmatic

Twenty-four centuries before MBTI, before the Big Five, before anyone had heard the word "psychometrics," Hippocrates watched people and noticed something obvious: people are wired differently from birth. Some are loud and restless. Some are quiet and methodical. Some charge forward, some hang back.

He attributed it to bodily fluids — blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm. The biology was wrong. The behavioral observations were not.

The four temperaments — sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic — remain the oldest personality framework still in use. Not because they're scientifically precise, but because they describe real patterns people recognize instantly.

The Four Types

Sanguine: The One Who Can't Sit Still

Sanguines are wired for stimulation. High energy, high sociability, low tolerance for boredom. They walk into a room and the room changes. Not because they're trying — they genuinely can't help it.

At their best: Enthusiastic, creative, persuasive. Sanguines generate ideas faster than they can execute them. They make work fun, bring people together, and inject optimism into grim situations. Sales, entertainment, teaching, entrepreneurship — anything involving people and novelty suits them.

At their worst: Flaky, disorganized, chronically late. They start ten projects and finish two. Emotional depth comes hard because they're already processing the next exciting thing before the current feeling fully registers.

The core tension: Sanguines need variety but also need follow-through. Their challenge isn't getting started — it's finishing. The friend who texts "let's definitely hang out soon" every month but never commits to a date? Probably sanguine.

In relationships: Magnetic initially, frustrating long-term unless they learn that consistency matters as much as chemistry. Their partner might feel like a priority one minute and an afterthought the next. It's not intentional — their attention just moves fast.

Choleric: The One Who Takes Over

Cholerics are built for action and dominance. They see a problem, they fix it. They see a group without leadership, they lead it. They don't wait for permission, consensus, or the right moment.

At their best: Decisive, efficient, fearless. Cholerics get things done when everyone else is still discussing options. They set ambitious goals and hit them through sheer force of will. CEO energy. Battlefield commander energy. "I'll sleep when it's finished" energy.

At their worst: Bulldozers. They steamroll opinions, dismiss feelings, and confuse aggression with strength. Delegation feels like weakness to an unhealthy choleric. Asking for help feels worse.

The core tension: Cholerics need control but their relationships need collaboration. Learning that "I can do it faster myself" is a long-term losing strategy takes most cholerics about half their life.

In relationships: Protective and loyal, but demanding. They respect partners who push back — doormats bore them. The fight isn't what damages the relationship; it's the choleric's refusal to be wrong afterward.

Melancholic: The One Who Thinks Too Much

Melancholics live in their heads. They analyze, plan, refine, and re-analyze. They see what's wrong with everything — including themselves. Perfectionism isn't a choice for them; it's a default setting they can't turn off.

At their best: Thorough, principled, insightful. Melancholics produce exceptional work because "good enough" physically pains them. They catch errors others miss, anticipate problems before they happen, and create systems that actually hold up under pressure. Research, engineering, writing, accounting, medicine — anywhere precision matters, melancholics thrive.

At their worst: Paralyzed by their own standards. They revise endlessly, miss deadlines because the work isn't perfect yet, and spiral into self-criticism when reality falls short of their ideal. They can turn a minor mistake into an existential crisis.

The core tension: Their high standards produce excellent work but also prevent them from ever feeling satisfied with it. The same inner critic that drives quality also drives misery.

In relationships: Deep and loyal once committed, but slow to open up. They've thought through seventeen reasons the relationship might fail before the third date. Once they trust you, their devotion is absolute. Break that trust and they'll remember — in detail — for years.

Phlegmatic: The One Who's Fine With Everything

Phlegmatics are the calm center of every storm. They don't escalate. They don't panic. They don't see the point of getting worked up about things they can't control.

At their best: Steady, diplomatic, reliable. Phlegmatics make excellent mediators because they genuinely understand multiple perspectives without getting emotionally invested in any single one. They keep teams functioning during crises, maintain consistency when everything around them changes, and create environments where other people feel safe.

At their worst: Passive to the point of inertia. They avoid conflict so thoroughly that problems fester instead of getting addressed. They go along with whatever requires the least friction, even when they disagree. Motivation is their ongoing battle — they can coast indefinitely if nothing forces movement.

The core tension: Their stability is an asset until it becomes stagnation. Phlegmatics need external pressure to change because their default state is comfortable enough to never warrant disruption.

In relationships: Easy to be around, difficult to read. Their partner might wonder "are you actually happy or just not bothered enough to leave?" Phlegmatics need to actively express preferences and desires instead of assuming their contentment communicates itself.

Which Temperament Are You?

Most people recognize themselves immediately in one or two descriptions. But if you're unsure, think about these questions:

When you walk into a party, do you work the room (sanguine), take charge of the music (choleric), observe from the corner evaluating whether this was a mistake (melancholic), or sit on the couch talking to whoever happens to be there (phlegmatic)?

When you face a deadline, do you wing it last minute in a burst of creative panic (sanguine), power through it three days early (choleric), agonize over every detail until 11:59pm (melancholic), or finish it calmly on time without drama (phlegmatic)?

When someone wrongs you, do you vent loudly and move on (sanguine), retaliate immediately (choleric), replay the scenario in your head for weeks (melancholic), or shrug and let it go (phlegmatic)?

Temperament Blends

Nobody is purely one temperament. Most people lead with one and have a strong secondary:

Choleric-Sanguine — Bold and charismatic. Driven but personable. The entrepreneur who inspires their team while also holding everyone accountable.

Melancholic-Choleric — High standards combined with execution power. The person who demands excellence and actually delivers it. Can be ruthlessly self-critical and critical of others.

Sanguine-Phlegmatic — Easygoing and social without the sanguine's nervous energy. Likeable, relaxed, agreeable. Struggles with ambition and follow-through.

Choleric-Melancholic — Intense and perfectionistic. They want to dominate AND be right. Probably exhausting but produces extraordinary results under the right conditions.

Phlegmatic-Melancholic — Quiet, analytical, and unbothered by external pressure. Internal standards without the external drive. Often found in technical or creative roles where they can work at their own pace.

Sanguine-Choleric — Maximum extroversion and assertiveness. Loud, commanding, entertaining. The friend who both organizes the trip AND makes it fun.

Are the Four Temperaments Scientific?

Strictly speaking, no. The four-temperament model predates the scientific method by about two millennia. It wasn't derived from controlled studies, factor analyses, or statistical validation.

But the behavioral patterns it describes map onto real dimensions that modern psychology has confirmed.

Sanguine traits correlate with Big Five extraversion and low conscientiousness. Choleric maps onto low agreeableness and high extraversion. Melancholic aligns with high neuroticism and high conscientiousness. Phlegmatic corresponds to high agreeableness, low neuroticism, and low extraversion.

The HEXACO model captures these dimensions with more precision. The Big Five does the same. The four temperaments are a rough sketch; modern trait models are the detailed portrait.

Does the rough sketch have value? Absolutely. It's intuitive, memorable, and gives people a starting point for self-reflection. Just don't confuse it with clinical diagnosis.

For a broader look at temperament as a concept and which modern tests measure it, see temperament test.

Four Temperaments vs. Other Frameworks

How do the four temperaments compare to popular personality tests?

vs. MBTI: MBTI gives you 16 types based on preferences. The four temperaments give you 4 types based on innate wiring. David Keirsey actually mapped the two systems together — SP types are Artisans (sanguine), SJ types are Guardians (melancholic/phlegmatic), NF types are Idealists, NT types are Rationals. The mapping is imperfect but illustrative. See mbti test.

vs. DISC: DISC is essentially a modern workplace adaptation of the four temperaments. Dominance = choleric, Influence = sanguine, Steadiness = phlegmatic, Conscientiousness = melancholic. The overlap is significant.

vs. Color personality models: Color-based tests often draw directly from temperament theory. Red = choleric, yellow = sanguine, blue = melancholic, green = phlegmatic. Different labels, same observations.

Using Your Temperament

Understanding your temperament isn't about excusing behavior. "I'm choleric so I can't help being aggressive" is bullshit. It's about knowing your defaults so you can work with them instead of against them.

Sanguines: build systems that compensate for your scattered attention. Use reminders, deadlines, and accountability partners.

Cholerics: deliberately practice asking questions instead of giving orders. Your instinct to take charge is an asset — but only when you've listened first.

Melancholics: set a "good enough" threshold before starting any project. Perfectionism without a cutoff is just procrastination in a lab coat.

Phlegmatics: schedule deliberate action. You'll never feel urgently motivated, so stop waiting for it. Just start.

Find Your Full Profile

The four temperaments give you a foundation, but personality is more than your baseline wiring. Take our free personality assessment to discover how your drives — for structure, understanding, agency, intensity, and connection — combine into a unique archetype. It measures where you fall on continuous dimensions rather than forcing you into a single box.

Soultrace

Who are you?

Stay in the loop

Get notified about new archetypes, features, and insights.